Board logo

標題: DVA股價 [打印本頁]

作者: may    時間: 2013-10-16 20:32     標題: DVA股價

請教老師同學,
yahoo finance DVA的歷史最高價在65附近, 盈再表的歷史最高是2013 131.3,
近年來也沒拆股紀錄, 巴菲特也很多買在股價100, , 不知這股價是怎麼回事? 感謝
作者: Joe    時間: 2013-10-16 20:57

2013-9-9 拆股 1股變2股盈再表原始財報資料未更新
作者: may    時間: 2013-10-16 22:02

請問Joe桑 在哪可看拆股資料?
作者: Tony0513    時間: 2013-10-17 08:33



QUOTE:
原帖由 may 於 2013-10-16 22:02 發表
請問Joe桑 在哪可看拆股資料?

google finance有

作者: Joe    時間: 2013-10-17 08:45

謝謝 Tony 桑或查盈再表 AY4 儲存格

作者: fortune1115    時間: 2013-10-17 09:58     標題: 資料有誤?

我看巴爺爺DVA的持有成本是在60.64-76.81(均價為71.05)  好像不是100多ㄟ??
作者: King818    時間: 2013-10-17 15:57

http://performance.morningstar.com/stock/performance-return.action?p=dividend_split_page&t=DVA&region=USA&culture=en-us




QUOTE:
原帖由 may 於 2013-10-16 22:02 發表
請問Joe桑 在哪可看拆股資料?


作者: may    時間: 2013-10-18 00:52

謝謝Tony、King818 & Joe桑,

巴爺爺的DVA持股成本已改過來了, 30~61之間。在這.. ..
http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?GuruName=Warren+Buffett&p=0
作者: Raimu    時間: 2017-3-5 18:08

來推坑 DVA

過去幾年DVA一直沒進入守備範圍的原因是因為完全不配息
但是2016開始有回購庫藏了...
老巴第一把買在3x附近(2011年) 後續這幾年也有在65左右陸續增持





[ 本帖最後由 Raimu 於 2017-3-5 18:12 編輯 ]
作者: Yvens    時間: 2017-3-6 21:30

https://www.fool.com/investing/2016/10/31/3-healthcare-stocks-warren-buffett-really-likes.aspx

穩定的業務模式DaVita在美國為終末期腎病(ESRD)的患者提供透析服務。該公司宣稱其市場份額約為36%。更好的是,DaVita的收入流在過去10年穩步增長。
這種收入增長是為什麼巴菲特的伯克希爾哈撒韋  擁有超過3800萬股DaVita股票的原因之一。另一個是公司的商業模式。DaVita提供急需的服務,節省患者的生命,並有助於降低總體醫療保健成本。對於許多患者,透析的唯一可行的選擇是接受腎移植,這可能花費數十萬美元。
DaVita不必擔心客戶流失。ESRD的患病率在美國增加,在未來可能增加。糖尿病是ESRD的最常見原因,在年齡較大的美國人中更常見 - 而美國人口正在老齡化。 .....>這個不用擔心像GILEAD沒有肝病的病人。
DaVita確實有一個缺點:公司沒有太多的定價能力為其服務。2016年上半年,大約42%的DaVita透析服務收入來自以Medicare為主要支付者的患者。Medicare設置了包括所有與透析相關的服務的捆綁支付率。DaVita不能像巴菲特所擁有的其他公司那樣簡單地命名其價格。  
作者: Ren    時間: 2017-6-9 17:55

手癢買了65 馬上被電

作者: Yvens    時間: 2017-8-14 01:23

在想是否要買一點DVA了......是等到淑價了...


作者: chunhsieh    時間: 2017-8-14 06:24

我也在注意DVA ,但最近川哥跟小恩在惱脾氣,或許可以在觀察一個月,看是不是可以買更低一點。
作者: chunhsieh    時間: 2017-8-14 06:25

字又打錯了,是鬧脾氣才對,不好意思
作者: Raimu    時間: 2017-10-10 16:55

https://investorplace.com/2017/10/earnings-season-uncertainty-weighs-on-market-sentiment/#.WdyKUTARVPY

JPMorgan調降DVA評等

There was bloodshed elsewhere in the sector as well.
Dialysis provider DaVita Inc (NYSE:DVA) fell 9.9% after suffering a downgrade from JPMorgan analysts on heightened concern about earnings.
作者: mikeon88    時間: 2017-10-10 17:20


作者: Yvens    時間: 2017-10-10 19:14

簡單說DVA捐錢給腎的基金會..而基金會導引腎的病人都去找DVA...(這樣的作法是違法的..)
而JPMORGAN估計DVA營收60%~80%是來自此路徑..
因此當這爆開時...DVA後續的營收可能會大受影響.....所以DOWNGRADE..
還請DUWA大神從醫界角度開釋一下...是否是進場時機?

https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/10/09/why-davita-inc-sank-lower-today.aspx

So whatEarlier this year, DaVita and fellow dialysis company Fresenius Medical Care (NYSE:FMS)received subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice over their contributions to the American Kidney Fund, a charity that provides financial assistance for patients who need dialysis.
The relationships between the companies and the nonprofit have raised concerns: Would the donations from the two largest kidney-dialysis companies lead American Kidney Fund to favor patients going to those dialysis facilities, while shunning patients going to facilities that haven't made contributions? The charity has an agreement with the government that forbids it from choosing patients based on their clinics.
American Kidney Fund was also helping patients pay for private insurance rather than rely on Medicaid, which would pay the dialysis facilities less per patient than private insurers. Those insurers are trying to figure out which patients American Kidney Fund is subsidizing and remove them from their rolls.
Now whatDaVita hasn't disclosed the total number of commercial patients that American Kidney Fund is subsidizing, but the J.P. Morgan analyst estimates that 60% to 80% of DaVita's earnings power is derived from its relationship with the American Kidney Fund. That isn't actually 60% to 80% of DaVita's total patient population, but since those patients are more profitable, they represent a larger portion of earnings.
If the analyst is right on his estimate and the profitable patients go away through either a settlement or court order, it could be painful to DaVita's earnings.

作者: dagunding0407    時間: 2017-10-10 22:28

我覺得這個事件只是一時的,等風頭過去了,照樣繼續這樣操作。DVA捐錢資助基金會->基金會介紹腎友DVA->腎友使用DVA服務
因為人總是會忘記,不管是台灣人還是阿豆仔,都是。
要關注的是DVA的好學生特質有沒有發生改變,它能不能好很久
我是覺得不變啦,教祖不是也買了…
作者: duwa    時間: 2017-10-11 11:17

大家仔細看FMS股價跌得沒DVA多。
風險就是美國法務部開出天價罰款及醫療保險業者大砍受到American Kidney Fund(DVA)補助的病人,這兩點超出我範圍唷。

作者: Raimu    時間: 2017-10-11 14:11

牽涉到法規的利空通常都會持續好一陣子
例如某W銀行
作者: Joe    時間: 2017-10-11 16:04

FMS 是 ADR 德國股票

作者: 小安    時間: 2017-11-8 23:50

DVA財報不如預期,目前跌了9%...
作者: sywang33    時間: 2017-12-7 00:36

UNH 要買 DVA ...

https://seekingalpha.com/news/3316562-unitedhealths-optum-acquire-davita-medical-group-davita-3-percent-premarket



[ 本帖最後由 sywang33 於 2017-12-7 00:39 編輯 ]
作者: Curry    時間: 2018-7-5 21:54



QUOTE:
原帖由 sywang33 於 2017-12-7 00:36 發表
UNH 要買 DVA ...

https://seekingalpha.com/news/33 ... 3-percent-premarket




  1. 僅有DaVita Medical Group (DMG)要賣給UNH,DVA仍保有DaVita Kidney Care (Kidney Care)
  2. Overview of DaVita Inc.
    The Company has consisted of two major divisions, DaVita Kidney Care (Kidney Care) and DaVita Medical Group (DMG). Kidney Care is comprised of our U.S. dialysis and related lab services, our ancillary services and strategic initiatives, including our international operations, and our corporate administrative support. Our U.S. dialysis and related lab services business is our largest line of business and is a leading provider of kidney dialysis services in the U.S. for patients suffering from chronic kidney failure, also known as end stage renal disease (ESRD). DMG is a patient- and physician-focused integrated healthcare delivery and management company with over two decades of providing coordinated, outcomes-based medical care in a cost-effective manner.
    On December 5, 2017, we entered into an equity purchase agreement to sell our DMG division to Collaborative Care Holdings, LLC (Optum), a subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group Inc.(僅有DMG要賣給UNH) The transaction is expected to close in 2018 and is subject to regulatory approval and other customary closing conditions. As a result of this pending transaction, the DMG business has been reclassified as held for sale and its results of operations are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented in our consolidated financial statements included in this report.
  3. Our U.S. dialysis and related lab services business is a leading provider of kidney dialysis services for patients suffering from ESRD. As of December 31, 2017, we provided dialysis and administrative services in the U.S. through a network of 2,510 outpatient dialysis centers in 46 states and the District of Columbia, serving a total of approximately 197,800 patients. We also provide acute inpatient dialysis services in approximately 900 hospitals and related laboratory services throughout the U.S.

  4. http://www.rocketfinancial.com/FetchDoc.aspx?fid=6443418


[ 本帖最後由 Curry 於 2018-7-5 22:07 編輯 ]
作者: Curry    時間: 2018-7-5 22:04

  1. NYSE:FMS費森尤斯歐洲股份兩合公司(德語:Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA)是一間總部位於黑森州巴特洪堡德國醫療技術和保健公司。該公司是《財富》雜誌評出的世界500強之一,也是德國最大的製藥醫療服務企業和私立醫院運營商,於2007年7月13日正式建制為歐洲股份公司[2],並於2009年3月23日成為德國DAX指數的成分公司[3]。此外,費森尤斯還持有透析企業費森尤斯醫療的多數股權[4]https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/费森尤斯
  2. Through its network of more than 3,700 dialysis clinics in North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Africa, Fresenius Medical Care provides dialysis treatments for more than 320,000 patients around the globe. Fresenius Medical Care is also the world‘s leading provider of dialysis products such as hemodialysis machines, dialyzers and related disposable products.https://www.fresenius.com/fresenius-medical-care

作者: Curry    時間: 2018-7-6 12:48

DaVita's Big Insurance Problem



Insurance Payers
DaVita (NYSE:DVA) is one of two large dialysis providers in the United States, and all of its profitability is propped up by its insurance payers. Insurance payers account for 33% of the company’s revenue but only make up 10.5% of its total patients. The problem is that since the federal government no longer mandates Americans buy health insurance, it is expected that roughly 13 million healthy Americans will opt out of having health insurance entirely. DaVita relies on its healthy patients’ insurance payments to support their kidney dialysis recipients - it takes 3,800 healthy patients to pay for 1 kidney dialysis patient ($150,000 annually). With those healthy patients no longer paying into health insurance, this means DaVita’s kidney dialysis patients could go unfunded. This means the company’s insurance paying kidney dialysis patients - its only profitable clients - are in danger. As a result, so is DaVita.

The American Kidney Fund

DaVita’s insurance payers rely heavily upon the American Kidney Fund (AKF) for financial support in its dialysis programs. The AKF helps by offering to pay health insurance premiums for its clients. This cushions the blow for patients and pads the bottom line for the company. Both DaVita and the AKF have come under fire in the past few years.
A lawsuit filed by United Healthcare alleged that DaVita steered Americans off of Medicare plans and onto commercial plans. The lawsuit went on to say that DaVita then encouraged those patients to receive aid from the AKF, which DaVita donates heavily to. As a result of all of this, health insurance companies have incorporated into their policies that they will no longer allow charitable donations to pay for patients’ premiums. DaVita acknowledge this in its latest 10-Q:

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4182203-davitas-big-insurance-problem



[ 本帖最後由 Curry 於 2018-7-6 13:04 編輯 ]
作者: Curry    時間: 2018-7-6 13:19

  1. UNH都出手要破壞DaVita跟AKF的合作模式,管見以為即便短期風頭過了但難保未來不會有類似狀況發生
  2. 不知Ted哥是否有其他的想法?

作者: Curry    時間: 2018-7-7 22:13


  1. https://www.healio.com/nephrology/practice-management/news/online/%7Bd894132b-b577-435e-8dec-401cd89d1b1e%7D/the-largest-dialysis-providers-in-2017-more-jump-on-integrated-care-bandwagon

作者: studentHank    時間: 2018-7-7 22:41

查了一下第一大
作者: ted_17    時間: 2018-7-8 09:40



QUOTE:
原帖由 Curry 於 2018-7-6 13:19 發表
UNH都出手要破壞DaVita跟AKF的合作模式,管見以為即便短期風頭過了但難保未來不會有類似狀況發生 不知Ted哥是否有其他的想法?  


Apologies, as of late I have been busy.
要討論這個事情,請容我把我的良知從腦袋裡拿出來。
以下為我的拙見。
輿論市場風氣怎麼談是一回事,我傾向認為法院的判決長期看來會幫助DVA還ˊ有UNH。
在美國政府提供的此表可以得知DVA 在美國各州都有Operation:通路廣;況且洗腎科技是比較精巧高度分工的。
腎病末期需洗腎病人不洗腎的這個決定與他們本身的生理條件不相容,換句話說不洗會死。
我傾向於不相信保險不給付就不會洗腎。保險不給付的項目為自費項目。
短期內使用DVA的病人可能會下降(保險不給付,我找別間洗腎中心),但是我認為不影響DVA長期的領導地位(可是離我家近的洗腎就那幾家,我不洗會死)。
保險公司只禁止慈善機構幫助病患繳保費,但是並沒有禁止慈善機構幫助病患繳自費項目帳單。(美國有錢人閒閒不知道要贊助哪種慈善事業的一大堆)
OK。現在把良知放回腦袋裡。我非常不贊同洗腎中心與慈善機構這樣的做法。
但是話說回來,
我很想要買FMS與DVA,但是現在已經持股一半了。


QUOTE:
原帖由 duwa 於 2017-10-11 11:17 發表
風險就是美國法務部開出天價罰款及醫療保險業者大砍受到American Kidney Fund(DVA)補助的病人,這兩點超出我範圍唷。


Duwa同學說的沒有錯,所以才會想要FMS&DVA兩頭買。
佛羅里達州District Court Case Number: 16-cv-81180-KAM
判決書PDF:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-flsd-9_16-cv-81180/pdf/USCOURTS-flsd-9_16-cv-81180-0.pdf
作者: Curry    時間: 2018-7-8 10:56

感謝Ted哥分享,不過FMS現在已貴價,看來DVA後續還有機會跌




歡迎光臨 巴菲特班 洪瑞泰 (Michael On) (http://mikeon88.freebbs.tw/) Powered by Discuz! 5.0.0